<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Goose Creek Financial</title>
	<link>http://gcfin.com</link>
	<description>Loudoun Health Insurance.  Small Business Benefits.  Life, Health, Community.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Premium Disparity in Health Insurance by wdporter</title>
		<link>http://gcfin.com/2008/11/premium-disparity-in-health-insurance/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>wdporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gcfin.com/2008/11/premium-disparity-in-health-insurance/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>I thought that would only apply to Short Term Disability? LTD doesn't pay for maternity leave does it?  Is the simple risk of complications of child birth enough to make LTD premiums higher?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that would only apply to Short Term Disability? LTD doesn&#8217;t pay for maternity leave does it?  Is the simple risk of complications of child birth enough to make LTD premiums higher?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Premium Disparity in Health Insurance by khshall</title>
		<link>http://gcfin.com/2008/11/premium-disparity-in-health-insurance/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>khshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gcfin.com/2008/11/premium-disparity-in-health-insurance/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Actually Women pay more for Long Term Disability as well.  As you might expect Child Bearing years have a lot to do with this as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Women pay more for Long Term Disability as well.  As you might expect Child Bearing years have a lot to do with this as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on February Financial Times by wdporter</title>
		<link>http://gcfin.com/2008/02/february-financial-times/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>wdporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gcfin.com/2008/02/february-financial-times/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>I like the first section taking Keynesian economics to task.  It was a great theory that has been fine-tuned and honed and winnowed over the decades but still comes down to three simple principles that even Keynes himself really did not approve of:

1) Debt is OK as long as you can keep spending.
2) The Government is a better arbiter of economics than the market.
3) It's not OK to have a recession.

Neither of these are true original Keynesian principles yet they have been responsible for most of the financial risk we now face.  See what Alan Greenspan had to say about it:

&lt;a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/economics/article577864.ece rel="nofollow"&gt;Speech to Federal Reserve Board, Feb. 2005&lt;/a&gt;

And &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics rel="nofollow"&gt;Wikipedia's article is OK, as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the first section taking Keynesian economics to task.  It was a great theory that has been fine-tuned and honed and winnowed over the decades but still comes down to three simple principles that even Keynes himself really did not approve of:</p>
<p>1) Debt is OK as long as you can keep spending.<br />
2) The Government is a better arbiter of economics than the market.<br />
3) It&#8217;s not OK to have a recession.</p>
<p>Neither of these are true original Keynesian principles yet they have been responsible for most of the financial risk we now face.  See what Alan Greenspan had to say about it:</p>
<p><a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/economics/article577864.ece rel="nofollow">Speech to Federal Reserve Board, Feb. 2005</a></p>
<p>And <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics rel="nofollow">Wikipedia&#8217;s article is OK, as well.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Loudoun County Arthritis Walk by health information &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Loudoun County Arthritis Walk</title>
		<link>http://gcfin.com/2007/11/loudoun-county-arthritis-walk/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>health information &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Loudoun County Arthritis Walk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gcfin.com/2007/11/loudoun-county-arthritis-walk/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Read the rest of this great post here [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arthritis Foundation Walk by wdporter</title>
		<link>http://gcfin.com/2007/10/arthritis-foundation-walk/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>wdporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gcfin.com/2007/10/arthritis-foundation-walk/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Having had a grandmother completely debilitated with Rheumatoid Arthritis, this is a big topic for me.  The medicine has actually come along way since she passed away, but there's still a long way to go.

Keep us posted, Tracie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having had a grandmother completely debilitated with Rheumatoid Arthritis, this is a big topic for me.  The medicine has actually come along way since she passed away, but there&#8217;s still a long way to go.</p>
<p>Keep us posted, Tracie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
